Thursday, June 30, 2011

Blue Ocean Summit 2011

Our friends at the Greater Boston Vineyard are hosting the Blue Ocean Summit 2011 on August 1-3, 2011, in Cambridge, MA, where you will hear about new and developing ways to engage your church communities in a “faith discovery process."

You will also have the chance to engage with several Blue Ocean Faith practitioners and speakers, nationally recognized church and cultural experts as well as other “Blue Ocean Faith” churches from across the country that are developing new and innovative models--such as the proven Seek program--and pathways for their church to introduce Jesus to an ever-increasing secular society.
The church family of the Greater Boston Vineyard Church will be our host for the summit and their team will share their Blue Ocean Faith story.


Wednesday, June 29, 2011

the Pitt 40: Worship, Warfare and World

My acquaintance, Matthew Self, wrote a provocative piece a while back on worship that has turned me in this direction of reconsidering worship, and I wanted to take time now to share it.  His full post can be found here, but there are several pieces that really coincide with what God is calling us into in Pittsburgh.

Matt quotes the senior pastor of the Gilbert Vineyard in Arizona, Jack Moraine:
"When we worship, we are in warfare whether we realize it or not. Everytime we worship, we are declaring which side we are on. The reason there is an intimate relationship between worship and warfare is because the warfare between the kingdom of God and the kingdom of darkness is all about worship. You don’t have to study the book of Revelation very deeply to see that both God and the devil are seeking worshippers (Revelation 14:7; 7:11; 13:4; 14:11). Time and again the line is drawn between those who “worship the beast and his image” and those who worship God."

This is exactly the issue of James K. A. Smith's book Desiring the Kingdom, and what we talked a lot about at this past year's Society of Vineyard Scholars conference in Seattle.  The practice of every day living and the cultural formation regarding what we worship that is going on all the time can distract us and can create false trails and influence us off to actually worship other things without our brains noticing.  Matt points out that this is the ongoing temptation against the church today. The enemy through all sorts of means continually seeks to distract, pervert, or dilute worship or even promote a misunderstanding of worship.  As the Church becomes more aware of God's presence in today's world, many Christian authors have taken up the topic of spiritual warfare. There are no shortage of books on the topic telling you how to pray down those dark principalities that impact everything from angelic battles taking place in Middle East or your school or your neighborhood or your marriage and your household.

 

The best example of spiritual warfare Matt found in the Bible is in 2 Chronicles 20.  As nations prepared to make war against Israel, this text outlines the whole process of Israel's heaven-approved response:
  1. Worship God before the trouble starts.
  2. Worship God in the midst of trouble, and wait on His word.
  3. Have faith in God's desire to fight your battles
  4. Witness and Give thanks to God for his love, grace and mercy
As it turned out, the kind of warfare that was fought was not a bloody battle against other human beings. For the people of God, worship was the warfare. They turned to God and chose to acknowledge his worthiness. They turned to God and said, no matter what happens here, we are submitting to You and Your judgement, but we are asking for Your mercy. God responded with mercy and fought the battle for them.  God does not want our songs, our intricate musicianship, or well-trained voices. Those are fine devices of worship, not worship itself. God wants our hearts, our submission, our confession of weakness, our acknowledgement that He is worthy of worship and we are not.

 
This is the missional-orientation of worship that integrates all of life, sees it – in all its audacity – that God is not the neutral, inattentive God, but rather God is alert to the specific realities of any situation, and does not flinch from taking sides, usually the side of the marginalized, and realizes in great trust - with Jurgen Moltmann - that the deeper purposes of God's justice work redemption to liberate the victims and seek repentance from the perpetrators in this now-and-not-yet age. Thus mysteriously we embrace both worshipful trust in a God who is good, but maybe not so safe (nod to C.S. Lewis). 

[to be continued...]

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

the Pitt 39: Prophetic Worship in the Face of Static Religion

Continuing in this vein of the missional-orientation of worship, there is a prophetic aspect to this trajectory that God has called us into, which counters the static religion of our time.  Say what?  Static what, you ask?  Static religion is something God can't stand, as the prophet Amos points out:

"I can't stand your religious meetings.
   I'm fed up with your conferences and conventions.
I want nothing to do with your religion projects,
   your pretentious slogans and goals.
I'm sick of your fund-raising schemes,
   your public relations and image making.
I've had all I can take of your noisy ego-music.
   When was the last time you sang to me?
Do you know what I want?
   I want justice—oceans of it.
I want fairness—rivers of it.
   That's what I want. That's all I want."

In Walter Brueggemann's insightful book The Prophetic Imagination, he clearly states the fact of static religion.  Static religion has fallen out of the radical middle.  What 'radical middle' are we talking about?  The radical middle between the Freedom of God and the Accessibility of God.  It happens when we don't acknowledge the 'both/and' of the 'now-and-not-yet'.  It happens where relationship with God has become a memory, whether we live in denial or not.  As Brueggemann points out, the freedom of God is always in considerable tension with the accessibility of God.  For myself, God is the most Free Person I know, but this tension should be inherent in our worship practices.  Static religion was seen as the establishment of a controlled set of worship practices that sort of put God in a box.  

The sovereignty and freedom of God is all but gone in static religion and too easily nation-states and leaders seek to fully subordinate static religion to their own purposes, whether legitimating their military, economic or political agendas.  This is where God is made accessible through the right way or the right person like a candy machine, put in the right amount of money, press the right button (or maybe we should say rub the lamp), and whoosh, the domesticated God is at your command, ready for your wish-fulfillment. Carol Wimber actually does a wonderful job of describing the issue nowadays like this: 


"When we look back and see Gods presence moving on us; forming us; worship had such an intricate part through all this. Over the years we’ve seen things change-shift, but from the very beginning we understood that worship wasn’t “for” anything, except for the Lord. Sometimes I get the feeling that we’ve shifted a bit too, “We worship in order for this to happen.” Whatever “this” is —a great move of the Spirit perhaps. But that truthfully is the opposite of what we’re doing in those early days. We were worshipping simply because God is worthy of worship. The wonderful things that happened were as a result of his presence. But we didn’t worship so that his presence would come; we just worshipped!  We didn't even really know about trying to 'make' things happen, or "we'll worship until the 'big' thing happens, or when the Spirit begins to move.  That wasn't why we were meeting together..."

To wrestle with a genuine alternative to this situation, we must admit: we all have deep committments to this in one way or another, and thus how can we seek to worship otherwise?  As in all things the issue with worship isn't worship...the issue with worship is God.  Perhaps our consciousness and imagination have been so co-opted that real courage must be asked for to enter into the wrestling match of what else might be possible.  The questions involved here are - I believe - where the missional-orientation of worship is taking us.  As R.D. Laing supposed, people are simply so busy, so drained, so unable to care or suffer or be truly joy-filled that they go through the motions and manage proper behaviour in whatever situation they find themselves; they have become so numb and are no longer able to experience their own experience.  Thus, given the situation we find ourselves in, how do we prophetically pique them, rouse them, awaken them to experience the Redeemer?
So, a few more questions: Have we fallen into the rut of static religion?  Have we fallen for worshiping in order to make God appear (like rubbing a lamp for a genie??)?  How do we change our minds and change our direction and get back to the radical middle?  Increasingly, this generations experiences are vicarious, ethereal and do not touch their everyday living...in such a context, how can we help people have experiences, so that they experience their own real experience?  What would prophetic worship in the face of this static religion look like today?  How can we help people to experience God and rouse them from the numbness that binds and blinds them? 

[to be continued...]

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

the Pitt 38: Towards Integrity in Worship

Last time, we sought to broaden our imagination and the landscape regarding worship.  One of the first issues significantly impacting me personally was integrity and the fusion of Worship and Justice that David Ruis has been prophetically speaking about for years.  Some of you might know him as he has been quite the creative voice and written many Vineyard music worship songs. I got to hang out with him briefly in February at SVS, and he's really a humble but passionate and inspiring kind-of-person.  Below are two videos from a Dutch interview with David Ruis on Justice & Worship (the Intro. is in Dutch, but the interview is actually in English).
Part 1:



Part 2:



There is so much that David says that resonates deeply in my own heart.  Worship and Justice.  The perspective and vision of the Reign of God vs mere humanitarian efforts.  The reflection and discernment of the consequences of our well-intentioned actions may be.  God has increasingly revealed to me that Justice & Worship are at the heart of my own personal struggles with worship @ church recently. This is something my friend Steven Leyva and I have been working on, praying about, talking toward, since January; and for me it's core to my own calling and struggle...and I think quite possibly, it's core to who I think God wants us to be in Pittsburgh.  I think it drives us toward the deeper questions of the cost of worship.  How to I align my life and wrestle with the question of how much I am willing to sacrifice to journey along the Jesus Way...? 

We have to wrestle with this, because I want God to not just endure our gatherings but rather and much more: to inhabit them.  In order to go there, we'll need to change our minds about worship gatherings that just offer brilliant music and therapy sessions.  We'll need to go beyond "solemn sacrifices" (i.e., tithes and offerings) to equally challenging each other about unjust living (including seeing the structural injustice that we may participate in, and embracing things like Fair Trade).

God wants justice [in the Hebrew mishphat - can be thought of as more of a prophetic proclamation of what's wrong and what needs to be done] and righteousness [in the Hebrew tsedeqah - the action of "setting things right", and not just personal holiness (although that's included) but going about setting all things right as we are led to encounter what the Father is doing] to wash over the world.  Then, with this integrity of offering ourselves to the Agenda of God, being the gathered of the Missio Dei, our light will break forth like the dawn, and our healing will come quickly...then we will be like a well-watered garden.

...my heart yearns for these things...


[to be continued...]

Friday, June 10, 2011

living sacrifice


"Our whole lives have now become expressions of worship that go far beyond words, and all of life has become a living sacrifice...[t]his is the only reasonable worship."

~ David Ruis

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

the Pitt 37: the Missional-Orientation of Worship

Over the last few months, our conversations among our friends called to Pittsburgh have taken a turn toward what we might call "back to basics."  We decided to turn our conversation toward three things that will undergird everything we do as a faith community in urban Pittsburgh.  Those things are: Worship, Prayer, Stewardship.

We start with Worship and the Missional-orientation of Worship.  One of the things I kind of like about the whole "Missional" conversation (as well as the Emerging Church conversation lo, those many moons ago) is the perspective that has taken root regarding worship.  The missional church conversation isn't obsessed with style and yet there is an expansiveness, maybe inherited from the Emerging conversation, with a simplicity that endeavours toward a worshipful experience in a "worship gathering."  I think most significantly, the missional/incarnational orientation is interested in context and culture and while renewal/redemption is a key aspect, it's welcoming and not all about themselves. Thus, a missional-orientation begins with a reversing a common phrase: the church doesn't have a mission, the Mission of God has a church, right?  Of course, as we've seen this changes our perspective on many things, and worship is probably a key one.  

So: where would being missionally incarnational orient us - posture us - in terms of worship?

 
I have several specific suggestions in terms of trajectories to explore and discover, but I want to start with a bigger perspective.

First, the missional orientation seems to assume a public context for the Missio Dei, and so that goes for worship as well. In the churches with which most of us have experienced and been a part of, the primary context is private. Worship many times is done (and thus modeled) and witnessed as a part of some kind of inward aspect of the church.  There's nothing particularly wrong with this sort of trajectory until it runs into individualist worship experience momentum and consumer critique.  Yet I think worship in a missional orientation would assume a much broader landscape. It would worship in the presence of and for the sake of the world because we are joining God's Mission in and for the world.  There is a "priesthood of the believer"-aspect to this that Mark Love has been really helping me explore and I want to really get into that a few posts from now. 

But I'm wrestling with how exactly missional worship would integrate all of life, and thus perhaps a connecting point between God and us and the world (again, more on that in the next few posts).  Also, in keeping with this integrating-impulse and what The Tangible Kingdom significantly invested in: missional worship would welcome the stranger, the sojourner.  This is also about the Presence of God-factor, which undergirds all of life as worship, with God, His People and the world set for redemption.  The Presence-factor oriented missionally, seems to be involved in all three, and not to the exclusion of any one.




But what does that look like?  For today, perhaps this takes us along three distinct trajectories:
  • Service: This expansive trajectory has to do with life as an on-going act of worship, which would include seeking justice as an act of worship and the Romans 12 issues of "being a living sacrifice" as we live our lives...this is our spiritual act of worship.
  • Hospitality: Maybe if we can see hospitality as something more than just the "welcome person" at the doors of a Sunday gathering or the person making coffee?  If so, we might see that hospitality would include what Jesus did so much of with strangers and sojourners: table-fellowship as a center of worship experience. This is the place of God's welcome. At weekly, monthly and seasonal parties in ancient Israel (Sabbath meals, harvest festivals, etc.) it was a place to welcome the marginalized, and be inclusive of the poor, the widow, the orphan, the priest.  It should be a place where faith, hope, and love are put on public display, right?
  • Creativity: some of the more immediate questions regarding worship, intersecting the really significant creation of space/place and aesthetics in a fuller worship experience of God beyond (but astill including) corporate music: creating space for creativity: so poetry, painting, dancing, etc., that instead of always being "performance art" might look a bit more like a jam session.
     
So questions to start us off:  What do you think about some of the actual practices that this orientation suggests so far: worship gathering with expansive and inclusive art/music (something like what our friends Bill and Ashley Hoard have hosted at home in the past that had an invitational and inclusive nature and this sharing nature about the gathering.  This - to me - resonated with what I hear as the organic nature of a gathering (by no means the only way to do it, of course) in 1 Corinthians 14 - where when such a gathering takes place, each one has a song or inspired word or something they have learned or a testimony of God's action in their lives or lives of their friends, etc.; and what can we imagine regarding serving the vulnerable as an act of worship; and what about dinner-parties/house parties/neighborhood block parties are public acts of worship?  What are other concrete practices and initiatives that we can be intentional about as a community?  Are there other large, organizing impulses and practices for worship that inform our incarnational, missional and relational orientation?

[to be continued...]

Sunday, June 5, 2011

confession of faith

"Confession of faith is not to be confused with professing a religion. Such profession uses the confession as propaganda and ammunition against the Godless. The confession of faith belongs rather to the "Discipline of the Secret"...[t]he primary confession of the Christan before the world is the deed which interprets itself. If this deed is to have become a force, then the world will long to confess the Word. This is not the same as loudly shrieking out propaganda..."

~ Dietrich Bonhoeffer, from his Prison Letters

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

the Pitt 36: Doctrine You Can Rely On

"But when the kindness and love of God our Savior for humanity were revealed it was not because of any upright actions we had done ourselves; it was for no reason except his own faithful love that he saved us, by means of the cleansing water of rebirth and renewal in the Holy Spirit which he has so generously poured over us through Jesus Christ our Savior; so that, justified by his grace, we should become heirs in hope of eternal life. This is doctrine that you can rely on."Titus 3:4-8

...doctrine that you can rely on...
Thus today our rabbit trail ends and next time, we'll get back to the journey toward cultivating a faith community in Pittsburgh.  Having wrestled with some issues with my neo-Reformed companions these past few weeks, they probably wonder if I rely on any "doctrine" at all, right?  But I do...I especially treasure this piece of Paul's letter to Titus from the Christian scriptures.

So much of what some people count as good "doctrine" [doctrine simply means teaching] seems off to me (of course, I am known for being wrong a lot too).  Some of it seems off-balance...and either it smacks of being trapped in what can be the dualism of Greek philosophical thinking or it seeks to (while falling terribly short) unveil an impenetrable and eternal mystery like YHWH-Elohim...or the incarnation of Christ...

Some espoused "doctrines" seem so trite and rather than making room for mystery and paradoxes and the unexplainable, they settle for easy answers.

Now, it isn't that I do not appreciate the struggle and wrestling with the mystery...as I heard Wimber used to say, 'never trust a man without a limp'...which basically warns us to be careful about people who haven't really wrestled like Jacob with the mystery that is God. 

I guess it's the contentment with cheap and shallow answers that gnaws at my bones through the night and has me wrestling with the angel until dawn.

I think at times - out of our own insecurity - we teach our children these trite easy answers...instead of inviting them into the mystery as partners in it, partakers of the divine so-to-speak.  We seek to give them security (as well as cobble together some for ourselves), when the security they (and we) truly want/need is love and beauty, not pat and trite answers.

Yet when the kindness and love of God our Saviour is revealed...this is true doctrine!

The Holy Spirit poured generously over us...this is true doctrine.

Embracing grace to become the heirs of hope in participating in the eternal life of God and His will/Kingdom...

...this is doctrine I rely on.

[to be continued]